Thursday, September 22, 2005

Referendum C and D homepage.

Polls:

Mason-Dixon Oct 11-13
Referendum C Yes: 47% No: 44% Undecided: 9% MOE:4%
Referendum D Yes: 44% No: 45% Undecided: 11% MOE:4%

POS Oct 10-12
Referendum C: Yes:49% No:46% Undecided:5% MOE:4.38%
Referendum D: Yes:50% No:44% Undecided:6% MOE:4.38%

Dan Willis* 08/05
Referenda C: For 48%. Against 44%. Undec. 8%. MoE 4%.
Mason Dixon 07/05
Referenda C: For 43%. Against 42%.
Referenda D: For 39%. Against 45%.


Update 10/17/2005 Rosen Reveals Part of GOP Strategy.

Update 10/17/2005 Closer Look at Friday's RMN Poll Results.

Update 10/16/2005 New Denver Post Poll Out.

Update 10/14/2005 New Polling Out, C and D within MOE.

Update 10/12/2005 Caldara and Allies Outspending Vote Yes on C and D.

Update 10/10/2005 Mile High Delphi Reveals New Model. Initial Prediction, C and D lose 47-53.

Update 10/05/2005 C and D Need More Money to Win.

Update 10/04/2005 A look at what we look at as we build the Referendum C and D model.

Update 10/04/2005 Ciruli Says C and D Statistically Tied.

Update 9/26/2005 Delphi on the Battle Over Ref. C and D.

Update 9/23/2005 A look at the coming battle.

Update 9/22/2005

The battle over C and D is shifting into high gear. Republican Gubernatorial candidate Mark Holtzman has hitched his horse to the No on C campaign. If C goes down his stock will go up. He is now being featured on Anti-C commercials that are financed by, among others, his father.

A new front has opened in the battle, earlier in the month Jon Caldara and the No on C campaign sued over the title of the issue. Rocky Mountain News political columnist Peter Blake, a fairminded journalist, sided with Caldara...

Earlier this week Jon Caldara and other foes of Referendum C sued the secretary of state and the legislature because, they said, the ballot title erroneously says it will enable the state to spend extra billions on roads, schools and health care over five years "without raising taxes." In fact, the plaintiffs argue, "if Referendum C passed, the measure would raise net taxes."

Under the rules laid down by the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, says Caldara, the ballot title should ask: "Shall state taxes be increased $3.7 billion over five years" by raising the TABOR baseline. He asked the Jefferson County District Court to force this change in the ballot title. (For what it's worth, Caldara didn't protest Referendum D, since its operative phrase on the ballot title is "Without increasing any tax rates or imposing any new taxes . . ." In other words it notifies voters of the distinction between hiking taxes and hiking tax rates.)

The point here isn't to debate whether or not spending tax money that would otherwise be refunded to the citizenry is in fact a tax hike. The point is that the courts will refuse to address a possibly faulty ballot title before the election.


In other news, Dan Willis reported on Coloradopols that Referendum C had pulled up to 48-44. We have no reason to doubt these numbers, it still is a statistical tie.

* Not really sure how to characterize this poll. Here is what Dan said about it:
The poll numbers I quoted were given in a public forum I attended a couple of weeks ago. They were supposedly from one of the well-known pollsters (Talemy-Drake is in my mind, but I honestly don't remember for sure).





8/30/05 Update.

Original Post 8/21/2005

The big contest this fall is Referendum C (D only matters if C passes).

This page is designed to answer any questions someone may have about C and D and it will provide you with quick links to the supporters and opponents of C and D.

Mile High Delphi has no opinion on C and D.

Lets answer some basic questions. What will C and D do? Who is supporting C and D? Why? Who opposes C and D? Why?

What Will C and D Do?

"What is Referendum C?

C Suspends state spending limits for five years.

C Allows lawmakers to spend about $3.6 billion they otherwise would have to refund to taxpayers.

What is Referendum D?

D Allows the state to borrow against that money to begin transportation and school construction right away."

Source Rocky Mountain News.

Who is supporting C and D and why?

Vote Yes on C and D. The two Referenda are currently (updated on 8/21/05) endorsed by 522 organizations. The Vote Yes on C & D campaign committee had nearly 1.3 million dollars on hand as of July 26th.

Some of the major donors to the Yes on C & D campaign are the AFSCME Council 76 which gave $100,000 on 07/22/05, the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce which gave $250,000 on 07/21/05, Centura Health gave $195,000 on 07/15/2005 and the Colorado Education Association gave $200,000 on 07/26/05.

Sometimes you feel like you just get a bunch of spin as to why to vote yes or no on something. Here at Mile High Delphi we've decided to just give you a link to the supporter's website (that way you don't have to read our spin). Here is why Vote Yes on C & D thinks you should vote yes.

Who opposes C and D and why?

Vote No; It's Your Dough. The two Referenda are currently (updated on 8/21/05) opposed by Americans for Prosperity, Americans for Tax Reform, The Club for Growth, Colorado Union of Taxpayers, Freedom Works, National Taxpayers Union, Save Tabor.com and the Colorado Republican Business Coalition. The Vote No; It's Your Dough campaign committee had $107,279.49 on hand as of July 26th.

Vote No; It's Your Dough had only three donors over the reporting period. Helen Sweeney gave $25.00. Edward McVaney gave $100,000. Brent Bickel gave $5,000. All on 07/19/05. This only tells part of the story. Two of the major opponents of C and D, Jon Caldara and John Andrews, both have radio shows which they use to attack the referenda items. Also, the Independence Institute is running radio commercials that basically attack C and D as tax increases (but which don't advocate a no vote so therefore count as "educational" and protect the Institute from losing its tax exempt status).

The best "No on C and D" website I've been able to find so far is this one, TaxIncrease.org.

Polling:

There is only one poll out on C and D so far:

Mason Dixon 07/05
Referenda C: For 43%. Against 42%.
Referenda D: For 39%. Against 45%.

Top of the Ticket!

Poll average Ritter (D) 51.7% Beauprez (R) 35% Spread Ritter +16.7

Update (10/05/2006)

If you want a page that has everything you could want on this race go here. Real Clear Politics has done as good a job as anyone out there looking at this race.

As for this race. The Beauprez campaign cannot seem to get any traction against Ritter. Beauprez cannot even get the GOP voters lined up behind him, nevermind the unaffiliated voters. Don't mind those biased attacks against the Beauprez campaign that come out from the likes of coloradopols which is a liberal attack blog that masquerades as "Politics, News and Inside Information." (Not that we don't like liberal websites, squarestate.net is a daily read, and they state that they are progressives up front.)

The main problem Beauprez has is that this year the public is generally against the Republicans. National scandals and the 6 year political itch give Beauprez a strong headwind that he seems to be making no progress against. Unless his poll numbers can pull to within five points he will lose to Ritter, if it is a blowout the GOP could lose more seats in the State Legislature (which the Democrats already control) and the Democrats could pick up the 7th Congressional District.

Update (8/15/2006)

I've just received a bunch of data from Matrow that has caused us to move this race from Barely GOP to Lean Dem.

The reasons for this are many and varied and others say it better than we can, but this graph of the price for a futures option from Tradesports.com shows it all.




The market has basically shown that the probability of the Bob Beauprez winning the Governor's race has dropped from about 70% in February to about 20% today. Now this market isn't very liquid, but it does have strong predictive powers.

Below you can see how the price on a Ritter to win option has gone up over the same time.




Larry Sabato has decided to put this race into the Leans Democratic category.

A link to Sabato's Crystal Ball and its page devoted to the Colorado Gubernatorial race is available here.

The Cook Political Report has this race listed as a Toss Up. A link to their gubernatorial Race Ratings page is available here.

Here are some recent polls:

Rasmussen Ritter (D) 48% Beauprez (R) 39% Undec. 12% August 14

Mason-Dixon Ritter (D) 42% Beauprez (R) 35% Undec. 23% July 17

Rasmussen Ritter (D) 42% Beauprez (R) 37% Undec. 16% July 10

The guys over at Coloradopols have a page with more polls on it. Click here.

Polling:
8/19-24/2005 Ritter (D) 44% Beauprez 42% Undec. 14%

Update (4/27/06)

We are going to move this race into the Barely GOP category.

The race breaks down like this. It is going to be a Bill Ritter (D) vs. Bob Beauprez (R) matchup.

Here is a graph of how much a option for the GOP winning the Colorado Governor's race is going for on Tradesports.com:




As you can see the market over at Tradesports has moved the probability of the GOP winning Colorado's open Governor's seat from 70% down to 51% today.

Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball has the race listed as a Toss Up, we think he is hedging, but check his site out.

Update (9/22/05)

Here is a link to a post over at Polstate. It appears that a early poll is out that shows Ritter leading Beauprez. All polling information will be placed at the top of this page.

Original post (8/30/05)

As of right now (over a year out from the election) there seems to only be three big players in the Governor's race.

On the Republican side there is Bob Beauprez and Mark Holtzman.

Bob Beauprez's website is available here. So far he appears like the slight favorite in the race. He has won a straw poll and has better name recognition than Holtzman.

Mark Holtzman's website is available here. While Beauprez seems like a slight favorite right now, Holtzman could easily win. We're waiting for some polls to point the way. Holtzman has the money lead right now, but we are a year out.

Edge...Slight Edge to Beauprez.

On the Democratic side there is only one man standing, former Denver D.A. Bill Ritter.

Ritter is a pro-life Democrat. It has been opined that he should be a strong candidate. If he doesn't have a primary we will get to see. Senator Salazar and Denver Mayor Hickenlooper both have declined to run.

Edge...Ritter.

Our predictions for the general election. Colorado had trended Republican during the late 90s and into the early part of this century, however a Democratic tidal-wave hit Colorado in 2004. Our preliminary prediction is that the Republican candidate has a slight advantage.

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Referendum C Odds Update 09/21/2005

The market book will be moving over to the Political State Report. Check there daily for price quotes and end of week graphs.

We will still have a condensed book on the sidebar.

Referendum C to win continues to surge up in bidding. Over the past two days it has moved up from 48 to 55. Word over at ColoradoPols is that Ref. C has moved to within striking distance. Hat Tip to Dan Willis for keeping his ear to the grapevine. No action on the No on C contract.


The market has begun. Remember it is free to play. Click on the "sign up" link to the right and join in. There is lots of room for new participants. Sign up. Read the FAQs. Win $200.

Here is where the market stands now:
Name of Contract.0-100...Moneyline...Fractional.
Ref. C to lose.....52......-108...........10/11.
Ref. C to win......55......-122.............5/6.

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Referendum C Futures Market Book 9/20/05

Today's trading starts at 6:00 PM for the Referendum C Futures Market. Remember no trading over the weekend. Below you will see a table that shows the best trading information. The opening prices were established by auction. B Qty = How many contracts are offered for sale at the best price. Bid = the price those contracts are being offered for. Offer = The best price that is being offered for a contract. A Qty = the number of contracts that are wanted at that best price.
































Best to SellBest to Buy
Contract NameB QtyBIDOfferA QtyLastVolChange
Ref. C to Win10053501005075+2
Ref. C to Lose505253255200

Below is the C to win book. Green indicates buyers. Red indicates sellers.
























Referendum C to Win Book
QtyPricePriceQty
254753100
1004055200
20040





















Referendum C to Lose Book
QtyPricePriceQty
50525325

Referendum C Odds Update 09/20/2005

Referendum C to win has moved up to even money...


The market has begun. Remember it is free to play. Click on the "sign up" link to the right and join in. There is lots of room for new participants. Sign up. Read the FAQs. Win $200.

Here is where the market stands now:
Name of Contract.0-100...Moneyline...Fractional.
Ref. C to lose.....52......-108...........10/11.
Ref. C to win......50.......100...............1/1.

Monday, September 19, 2005

Ref. C Futures Market 09/19/2005

All prices are unchanged over the weekend.

Friday, September 16, 2005

Week in review.

This week the market acted much as we thought it would. The opening prices didn't change at all. We signed up a dozen new traders. It appears that everyone is waiting for some new information before they begin to move.

Referendum C Futures Market Book 9/16/05 (week in review tonight at 7:00)

Today's trading starts at 6:00 PM for the Referendum C Futures Market. Remember no trading over the weekend. Below you will see a table that shows the best trading information. The opening prices were established by auction. B Qty = How many contracts are offered for sale at the best price. Bid = the price those contracts are being offered for. Offer = The best price that is being offered for a contract. A Qty = the number of contracts that are wanted at that best price.
































Best to SellBest to Buy
Contract NameB QtyBIDOfferA QtyLastVolChange
Ref. C to Win254847254800
Ref. C to Lose505253255200

Below is the C to win book. Green indicates buyers. Red indicates sellers.
























Referendum C to Win Book
QtyPricePriceQty
25474825
100405050
20040





















Referendum C to Lose Book
QtyPricePriceQty
50525325

Thursday, September 15, 2005

Referendum C Futures Market Book 9/15/05

Today's trading starts at 6:00 PM for the Referendum C Futures Market. Below you will see a table that shows the best trading information. The opening prices were established by auction. B Qty = How many contracts are offered for sale at the best price. Bid = the price those contracts are being offered for. Offer = The best price that is being offered for a contract. A Qty = the number of contracts that are wanted at that best price.
































Best to SellBest to Buy
Contract NameB QtyBIDOfferA QtyLastVolChange
Ref. C to Win254847254800
Ref. C to Lose505253255200

Below is the C to win book. Green indicates buyers. Red indicates sellers.
























Referendum C to Win Book
QtyPricePriceQty
25474825
100405050
20040





















Referendum C to Lose Book
QtyPricePriceQty
50525325

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Referendum C Odds Update.

The market has begun. Remember it is free to play. Click on the "sign up" link to the right and join in.

Here is where the market stands now:

Name of Contract.0-100...Moneyline...Fractional.
Ref. C to lose.....52......-108...........10/11.
Ref. C to win......48.......108...........11/10.

Referendum C Futures Market Book 9/14/05

Today's trading starts at 6:00 PM for the Referendum C Futures Market. Below you will see a table that shows the best trading information. The opening prices were established by auction. B Qty = How many contracts are offered for sale at the best price. Bid = the price those contracts are being offered for. Offer = The best price that is being offered for a contract. A Qty = the number of contracts that are wanted at that best price.
































Best to SellBest to Buy
Contract NameB QtyBIDOfferA QtyLastVolChange
Ref. C to Win254847254800
Ref. C to Lose505253255200

Below is the C to win book. Green indicates buyers. Red indicates sellers.
























Referendum C to Win Book
QtyPricePriceQty
25474825
100405050
20040





















Referendum C to Lose Book
QtyPricePriceQty
50525325

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Referendum C Futures Market Book 9/13/05

Today's trading starts at 6:00 PM for the Referendum C Futures Market. Below you will see a table that shows the best trading information. The opening prices were established by auction. B Qty = How many contracts are offered for sale at the best price. Bid = the price those contracts are being offered for. Offer = The best price that is being offered for a contract. A Qty = the number of contracts that are wanted at that best price.


































Best to Sell Best to Buy
Contract NameB QtyBIDOfferA QtyLastVolChange
Ref. C to Pass254847254800
Ref. C to Lose505253255200

Monday, September 12, 2005

Referendum C Futures Market 9/12/05

Trading starts today at 6:00 PM for the Referendum C Futures Market. Below you will see a table that shows the best trading information. The opening prices were established by auction. B Qty = How many contracts are offered for sale at the best price. Bid = the price those contracts are being offered for. Offer = The best price that is being offered for a contract. A Qty = the number of contracts that are wanted at that best price.

































Best to Sell Best to Buy
Contract NameB QtyBIDOfferA QtyLastVolChange
Ref. C to Pass254847254800
Ref. C to Lose255253255200

Tuesday, September 06, 2005

How to sign up.

During the auction:

During the auction (09/06/05-09/11/05):

The first thing you need to do is open an account. Send an e-mail to milehighdelphi@yahoo.com

Include your e-mail address and a username. We will give you a codeword. It will arrive in your e-mail within 24 hours. This allows you to access your account. Everyone's account starts at $100.

When you contact us you will need to state how many shares you want, of which contract and what you are willing to pay per contract.

Example e-mail:

blogicus@yahoo.com username: blogicus 100 shares for C to Win at 50 cents. codename alpha.

During the market period (09/12/05 - 11/01/05):

The first thing you need to do is open an account. Send an e-mail to milehighdelphi@yahoo.com

Include your e-mail address and a username. We will give you a codeword. It will arrive in your e-mail within 24 hours. This allows you to access your account. Everyone's account starts at $100.

Once you have an open account you can trade in two different ways. Live trading will occur between 6:00 and 7:00 PM. You can send us buy and sell orders anytime during the day, we will fill them on a first in - first out basis. During our live hours you can also call us at 720-252-7728.

When you contact us you will need to state how many shares you want to buy or sell, which type of contract, and either what you are willing to pay or what you are willing sell you contracts for.

Example e-mail:

blogicus@yahoo.com username: blogicus BUY 100 shares for C to Win at 50 cents. codename: alpha

Results and open orders will be available on Polstate.com after the close of business each day.

Rules and info for Futures Market will be posted at 5:00.

We are hammering out the details and rules for the futures market.

They will be posted later today.

We also will have details as to how the auction will work for establishing the opening prices for the contracts.

General Info and FAQ's

What is this?

The 2005 Referendum C Futures Market is an on-line futures market where the contract payoff is based upon the outcome of the upcoming Referendum C vote. This market is operated by the staff of Mile High Delphi. It is designed to test the predictive nature of futures markets.

How does it work?

The 2005 Referendum C Futures Market works in two ways; The A market is a regular futures market. You can purchase one of two contracts, a "Referendum C To Win" contract or a "Referendum C to Lose" contract. Each contract will pay $1, depending upon the outcome of the election. The B market is a contest where each participant in the A market gets one vote on what the actual percentage of the vote will be for Referendum C (to 1/100th of a percent, for example 52.13%). These votes will be due no later than 5:00 PM, Mountian Time, Monday, October 31st.

Who can participate?

This market is for research and teaching purposes. Anyone with a valid e-mail address can participate. Please don't double dip, one e-mail address per person.

Are the participants playing with real money?

NO. This is only a beta. You will receive $100 worth of "Betting Disks" that you can use to purchase futures contracts. We have to get "no-action-letters" from the Division of Trading and Markets of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission so that we can operate with real money without the risk of prosecution. With those we can start a real money market for the 2006 elections. The top three winners (those who would have had the greatest return if we were using real money) and the investor who most closely guesses the actual percentage of the vote that Referendum C receives will win prizes.

UPDATE: (10/26/2005) The payouts for the A market are 1st $100, 2nd $50 and 3rd $25. The payout for the B market is $100 for first.

How do we sign up?

You will go to our sign-up page. All you need to create an account with us is a e-mail account and a user name.

Sunday, September 04, 2005

Soy De Aqui! MHD's 2005 Referendum C Futures Market Opens 09/12.

Mile High Delphi will be opening the only futures market devoted to the upcoming vote on Referendum C.

The purpose of this futures market is to test if a market mechanism can be, or is, more correct than polling in predicting the winner and/or margin of victory in an election.

The following will explain how the market will function.

On 09/06 we will post the trading rules for this market. The market will function in much the same way as the Iowa Presidential Futures market, with some minor variations. Full rules will be available on Tuesday.

During the next week we will begin an auction to determine the opening prices for the market. The auction will be conducted from Tuesday until the 12th. Full details for the auction will be available tomorrow.

Live trading will be conducted Monday thru Friday. Results will be available on Polstate.

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Referendum C and D update (8/30/05).

Over the last week the Referendum C and D campaign entered a new phase. The Pro-C side shifted its tactics. They transformed their campaign from a single pronged attack that focused on introducing and selling the referenda to the voters, into a multi-front campaign. The new tactic was introduced on the 23rd by a series of Lynn Bartels articles in the Rocky Mountain News. One focuses on the attack against the Independence Institute. A link to it can be found here. The other focuses on the attack on the Colorado Club for Growth and Colorado Freedom Works. A link to it can be found here.

On the 25th a Bill Scanlon article revealed that two liberal groups, The League of Women Voters and Colorado Common Cause, were joining the Vote Yes on C&D campaign in calling for the Independence Institute, Colorado Freedom Works and the Colorado Club for Growth (all identified as conservative) to reveal their donors. A link to that article is available here.

In another Bill Scanlon article, this one from today, it became obvious that the Anti-C side was determined to repeal the attacks from the Pro-C side. House Minority Leader Joe Stengal (R) filed a complaint against Buffie McFadyen (D) saying that she was promoting C and D on taxpayer financed time.

The guys over at Coloradopols.com posted on this story on the 25th. If you don't already know, Coloradopols.com is THE place where political fanatics and insiders go in Colorado. A link to their post is available here. It is interesting not only for the body of the post, but the discussion in the comments section is also a wealth of information. They also have a poll that asks if you think C and D will pass. A link to that poll is available here.

Some more interesting sites to check for info on C and D.
Anti C:
Colorado Freedom Works
Colorado Freedom Report

Pro C:
The Bell Action Network
Vote No Its Your Dough.com

Cross posted at Polstate.com.

Sunday, August 28, 2005

In the hopper...

On the evening of September 30th we will update our C and D homepage, there is much to report on the campaign along with new links that need to be added.

We will open our "Top of the Ticket" section which will look at the 2006 Governor's race. We will have links to the different campaign websites along with predictions of who will win in November.

Lastly, we will begin an analysis called "From Tabor to Today" where we will look at what all of the statewide ballot referenda were supposed to do and what they either have or have not done, from Tabor's passage in the early 1990s until last year's election. Tabor to Today will wrap up the weekend before the big election.

Sunday, August 21, 2005

Updated predictions on C and D.

I've been creating some new models for predicting elections. I didn't feel very good after the 2004 elections because my models weren't anywhere near 95% accurate (especially on state issues). I've been working hard with the numbers. I'm using models now that instead of predicting percentages of the vote (like my last batch) now predict the likelihood of passage.

Using these new models, I now predict that Referendum C has a 20% likelihood of passage. Referendum D has a 16% probability of passage.

The current models only explain 80% of the results, in the coming months, as I add in more data from prior years, the models will get better and the numbers will change.

Friday, August 12, 2005

Early poll out on Ref. C and D.

A Mason Dixon poll from July found that support for Referendum C was at 43%. 42% of the 625 respondents said they would vote against the measure and 15% said that they were undecided. The poll was conducted July 11-13. Support for Referendum D was at 39%, with 45% against it.

Normally for a ballot issue to pass it must poll in at least the high 60s if it stands a chance of passing. However the supporters of C and D have already raised over $1 million while the referenda's opponents have raised only $100,000.

Thursday, June 16, 2005

Still here.

Just in case anyone was wondering, we are still here. We just have been collecting data and throwing around some new ideas for MHD. Don't worry, we'll have lots of info coming up in a few weeks.

Monday, April 18, 2005

Delphi on the State Senate.

We began our initial projection for control of the State Senate at 50-50. In general, the GOP has three more seats to defend than the Democrats, 10-7. Adding to the GOP's burden is the fact that they will have five Senators who are term limited, while the Democrats only have one.

In the past these seats have been easier for the GOP to defend. 2006 is a non-presidential year, the average turnout in these races in '02 was about 50%, however, the effects of campaign finance haven't been observed yet on these seats.


St. Senate - District 1 Eastern Plains
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 9941 24.82 %
(REP) 30112 75.18 %
MHD PVI: R + 16.98

St. Senate - District 2 SE Colorado
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 16545 40.84 %
(REP) 23962 59.16 %
MHD PVI: R + .96

St. Senate - District 3 Pueblo
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 26118 63.84 %
(REP) 14792 36.16 %
MHD PVI: D + 22.04

St. Senate - District 5 San Luis Valley and Southern Mountains
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 16553 39.00 %
(REP) 25895 61.00 %
MHD PVI: R + 2.8

St. Senate - District 6 Four Corners
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 24302 53.56 %
(REP) 21072 46.44 %
MHD PVI: D + 11.76

St. Senate - District 7 Grand Junction and surrounding areas
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 0 00.00 %
(REP) 28948 100.00 %
MHD PVI: R + 41.8

St. Senate - District 9 Part of El Paso County
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 0 00.00 %
(REP) 32139 100.00 %
MHD PVI: R + 41.8

St. Senate - District 11 Colorado Springs
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 11607 48.63 %
(REP) 12260 51.37 %
MHD PVI: D + 6.83

St. Senate - District 13 Weld County
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 0 00.00 %
(REP) 28245 100.00 %
MHD PVI: R + 41.8

St. Senate - District 15 Greater Ft. Collins
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 18531 37.55 %
(REP) 30825 62.45 %
MHD PVI: R + 4.25

St. Senate - District 16 Central Mountains
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 26585 52.39 %
(REP) 24156 47.61 %
MHD PVI: D + 10.59

St. Senate - District 20 Wheat Ridge
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 19707 50.24 %
(REP) 19520 49.76 %
MHD PVI: D + 8.44

St. Senate - District 22 Southern Jefferson County
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 15275 34.81 %
(REP) 28600 65.19 %
MHD PVI: R + 6.99

St. Senate - District 24 Northglen and Thornton
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 17383 57.55 %
(REP) 12820 42.45 %
MHD PVI: D + 15.75

St. Senate - District 30 Highlands Ranch and Parker
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 13076 29.06 %
(REP) 31925 70.94 %
MHD PVI: R + 12.74

St. Senate - District 32 SW Denver
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 28180 100.00 %
(REP) 0 00.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 58.2

St. Senate - District 34 West Denver
2002 Election Results:
(DEM) 18576 100.00 %
(REP) 0 00.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 58.2


Average Democratic Vote: 15434
Average Republican Vote: 21486
Breakdown of total vote: Democratic 41.8% Republican 58.2%

Non-Competitive Democratic Seats: SD 3, 32, 34.
Non-Competitive Republican Seats: SD 1, 2, 5, 15.

Competitive Democratic Seat: SD 24. Open Seat/Term Limits.
Competitive Republican Seats: SD 7, 9, 13, 22, 30. All Open/Term Limits.

Very Competitive Democratic Seats: SD 6, 16, 20.
Very Competitive Republican Seat: SD 11.

Cheat Sheet:
SD 6: GOP came close last time, Isgar should improve.
SD 11: Won by less than a thousand last time. Jones is about the only Republican that can win this seat. Light at the end of the El Paso County Dems tunnel?
SD 16: Fitz-Gerald may or may not be term limited. GOP came within 5% of Senate President last time, she's a big target. Repeat of Daschle?
SD 20: Keller won by 187 last time in Perlmutter's old district. If Jensen runs could be very close. Jeffco GOP stinging from recent losses, may have hit bottom in 2004.

The GOP has a lot of open seats to defend, if the Democrats have a good strategy and suck up some money by running in those districts they could easily defend all of their competitive seats and pick up SD 11. Due to the impact of campaign finance reform we don't believe that the GOP will perform as well this cycle as they did in 2002 (Owens swept the state with over 60%). Because of this we are moving the likelihood of the Democrats keeping the State Senate to 70%. We need to see if Fitz-Gerald will be term limited out and who the candidates line up for each race.

Our new projections for the state legislature now stand at GOP Control: 24% Democratic Control: 14% Split Control: 62%.

Cross Posted at Polstate.com.

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

Delphi on the 2006 Governors race.

In a new Ciruli Associates poll, Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper (D) polled extremely well. He had a higher positive to negative ratio than any other official mentioned in the poll, including Democratic Senator Ken Salazar, Republican Governor Bill Owens and President Bush.

Overall, Senator Salazar had the highest favorable rating; 71%. He was followed by Governor Owens who had a favorable rating of 66%, Mayor Hickenlooper with a rating of 61%, President Bush with 54%, Republican Senator Wayne Allard with 53% and CU Professor Ward Churchill with 11%.


Front Range voters, which comprise about 80 percent of Colorado's electorate, have an overwhelmingly positive view of Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper. Sixty-one percent of voters rate him favorably, and his positive-to-negative ratio is more than 10-to-1, exceeding that of many of the state’s leading politicians and President George W. Bush...Hickenlooper achieved his 61 percent favorable score despite of more than a third (34%) of voters not being familiar with him.


Recently, a campaign has sprung up to "draft Hick." Some pundits have been talking up Hickenlooper for weeks, such as Colorado Luis and Colorado Pols.

Hickenlooper appears to be strong not only in the City and County of Denver, where he recently polled in the low 90s, but also in the entire metro region. According to Ciruli:


Hickenlooper scores his highest favorability rating (75%) in the Denver metro area where he also is very well-known (only 19% can’t rate him). Nearly half of northern Colorado voters are unable to rate him and 78 percent of southern Colorado voters are unfamiliar with him. Because his negative-to-positive rate is high in the North and South Front Ranges, as more voters become familiar with him, his ratings should improve, at least under current circumstances.



It appears that if Hickenlooper runs the early battle will be to define him.

Additionally, it remains to be seen how "favorability" correlates to actual election results. Ken Salazar, who leads the poll with a favorability rating of 71% only received 51% of the vote in last year's Senate race against beer baron Pete Coors.

Cross posted at Polstate.

Monday, April 11, 2005

Delphi on the State House.

We will break the State House seats into three categories based upon their PVIs. An look at how the PVI (partisan voter index) that Mile High Delphi uses is available here. Basically, it is just a quick political handicapping tool that gives us a very general feel for how competitive the district is.

The three categories that we are going to break House seats down into will be Very Competitive (with a PVI below 5), Competitive (PVI between 5 and 10), and Non-Competitive (PVI above 10). This breakdown will give us a general feel for how competitive the House will be and what races we need to watch.

Dem Non-Competitive: HD 1-13, 24, 32, 34, 35, 41, 42, 46, 53, 61 and 62. Total 23.
GOP Non-Competitive: HD 14-17, 19-21, 38, 40, 43-45, 48, 51, 54, 57-59, 63 and 65. Total 20.

Dem Competitive: HD 18, 26, 36, 55 and 56. Total 5.
GOP Competitive: HD 25, 28, 37 and 60. Total 4.

Dem Very Competitive: HD 23, 29, 30, 31, 47, 50 and 64. Total of 7.
GOP Very Competitive: HD 22, 27, 33, 39, 49 and 52. Total of 6.

We will start out by looking at the "Sweet Sixteen." The Sweet Sixteen is made up of the sixteen most competitive districts. They are listed below from the most competitive to the least. From this we constructed our first prediction, which reveals how we have came up with our probabilities for who will control the House after 2006.

HD 52 PVI R - .00 2004 Results R 50.7% D 49.3%
HD 22 PVI R + .80 2004 Results R 51.8% D 48.2%
HD 27 PVI R + 1.04 2004 Results R 52.0% D 48.0%
HD 23 PVI D + 1.08 2004 Results R 49.9% D 50.1%
HD 33 PVI R + 1.67 2004 Results R 52.7% D 47.3%
HD 29 PVI D + 1.87 2004 Results R 49.1% D 50.9%
HD 47 PVI D + 2.76 2004 Results R 48.2% D 51.8%
HD 31 PVI D + 2.73 2004 Results R 48.3% D 51.7%
HD 50 PVI D + 4.12 2004 Results R 46.9% D 53.1%
HD 39 PVI R + 4.20 2004 Results R 55.2% D 44.8%
HD 64 PVI D + 4.72 2004 Results R 46.3% D 53.7%
HD 49 PVI R + 4.84 2004 Results R 55.8% D 44.2%
HD 30 PVI D + 4.85 2004 Results R 46.1% D 53.9%
HD 60 PVI R + 5.13 2004 Results R 56.1% D 43.9%
HD 56 PVI D + 5.69 2004 Results R 45.3% D 54.7%
HD 36 PVI D + 6.21 2004 Results R 44.8% D 55.2%

The sweet sixteen is made up of 7 GOP seats and 9 Democratic seats. Due to the record turnout last election (something on the order of 88%) and the fact that '06 is a midterm year, the Democratic tide that swept the state legislature last year will have difficulties increasing their holdings. If the 3% Democratic bump that normally accompanies presidential years is taken away the Democrats stand to lose at least 4 seats. Because of these factors, we put the probability of the GOP taking back the State House at 80%.

The State Senate has gone from GOP control in '98 to Dem control in '00, back to the GOP in '02 and back to the Dems in '04. Because of this, we will begin our probability of either party controlling the State Senate next year at 50%.

Those two numbers give you the projections that we currently have. GOP 40%, Dem 10% and Split Control at 50%.

I also found a few statistical points of interest.

Since the green party only ran in one House election, I focused my attention on the 17 races with a Republican, a Democrat and a Libertarian on the ballot. On AVERAGE the Republican got 13071 votes (47%), the Democrat got 13761 (49.5%) and the Libertarian got 928 votes (3.5%). Meaning, on average that the Libertarian vote would have to split seven votes Republican and two votes Democratic for the GOP to pick up those seats. ON AVERAGE. In reality, I only found one election where the Libertarian got a larger number of votes than the winning margin between the major parties (HD 23).

In the 31 districts where you had only a Democrat and a Republican on the ballot, on average the Republican got 15178 votes (51%) and the Democrat got 14525 votes (49%).

Perhaps the most interesting statistical fact was this. Each district should have a nearly equal population, and, all things being equal, you would think that having a 3rd party on the ballot would increase turnout. However, the average turnout for a race with three parties on the ballot was 27760, while 29703 turned out for the two party races. That is an increase of 7.2% on average. So it appears that, at least as far as these elections were concerned, the participation of 3rd parties lowered voter participation.

Cross posted at Polstate.

Friday, April 08, 2005

Delphi on Election 2006: House Districts in the Denver Metro Area.

Here are the 2004 election results (without any 3rd party candidates) and some modified Cook Partisan Voting Index numbers for the State House and Senate districts located in the seven county metro region (Denver Metro Area). Developed originally by Charlie Cook, these numbers give you a quick assessment of the generic partisan strength in any given district. Our Mile High PVI uses only the two party vote in each district for 2004. Here is how the numbers break down for a house member. Statewide Republicans got 51.00% of the vote in State House elections, Democrats won 49.00%. If a Democratic House member won in 2004 with 55% then that district's Mile High PVI is D + 6. (State Senate PVIs will be available later)

Adams County:

St. Senate - District 25
2004 Election Results:
Stephanie Takis (DEM) 22606 56.53 %
Kevin D. Blount (REP) 17386 43.47 %

St. Rep. District 30
2004 Election Results:
Mary Hodge (DEM) 10426 53.85 %
Shae Ortega (REP) 8936 46.15 %
MHD PVI: D + 4.85

St. Rep. District 31
2004 Election Results:
Judy Solano (DEM) 17563 51.73 %
Pam Rhodes (REP) 16386 48.27 %
MHD PVI: D + 2.73

St. Rep. District 32
2004 Election Results:
Valentin "Val" Vigil (DEM) 13117 62.48 %
David M. Borstel (REP) 7876 37.52 %
MHD PVI: D + 13.48

St. Rep. District 34
2004 Election Results:
Lois Tochtrop (DEM) 17214 100.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 51

St. Rep. District 35
2004 Election Results:
Larry Pace (REP) 7399 35.26 %
Ann Ragsdale (DEM) 13585 64.74 %
MHD PVI: D + 15.74

Arapahoe County:

St. Senate - District 26
2004 Election Results:
Jared B. Ingwalson (DEM) 27488 48.67 %
Jim Dyer (REP) 28994 51.33 %

St. Senate - District 27
2004 Election Results:
Nancy Spence (REP) 42749 61.52 %
Lisa Karen Love (DEM) 26740 38.48 %

St. Senate - District 28
2004 Election Results:
Bruce Cairns (REP) 22631 44.64 %
Suzanne S. Williams (DEM) 28066 55.36 %

St. Senate - District 29
2004 Election Results:
Bob Hagedorn (DEM) 20985 63.30 %
Mike Martin (REP) 12169 36.70 %

St. Rep. District 36
2004 Election Results:
Jim Parker (REP) 10676 44.79 %
Morgan Carroll (DEM) 13159 55.21 %
MHD PVI: D + 6.21

St. Rep. District 37
2004 Election Results:
Thomas M. Donahue (DEM) 13883 40.54 %
Lauri Clapp (REP) 20360 59.46 %
MHD PVI: R + 8.46

St. Rep. District 38
2004 Election Results:
Joe Stengel (REP) 19743 61.65 %
Glen L. Emerson (DEM) 12279 38.35 %
MHD PVI: R + 10.65

St. Rep. District 39
2004 Election Results:
David G. Balmer (REP) 21996 55.20 %
Mollie T.M. Cullom (DEM) 17851 44.80 %
MHD PVI: R + 4.2

St. Rep. District 40
2004 Election Results:
Martha J. Karnopp (DEM) 11107 36.91 %
Debbie Stafford (REP) 18982 63.09 %
MHD PVI: R + 12.09

St. Rep. District 41
2004 Election Results:
E. C. Gaffney Jr. (REP) 10404 38.40 %
Nancy J. Todd (DEM) 16066 59.29 %
MHD PVI: D + 10.29

St. Rep. District 42
2004 Election Results:
Michael Garcia (DEM) 10255 68.49 %
Marie Evelyn Archuleta-Rossmiller (REP) 4717 31.51 %
MHD PVI: D + 19.49

Boulder County:

St. Senate - District 17
2004 Election Results:
Brandon C. Shaffer (DEM) 34470 56.43 %
Sandy Hume (REP) 26616 43.57 %

St. Senate - District 18
2004 Election Results:
Ron Tupa (DEM) 52332 78.36 %
Krista Poch (REP) 14456 21.64 %

St. Rep. District 10
2004 Election Results:
Alice Madden (DEM) 27522 100.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 51

St. Rep. District 11
2004 Election Results:
Jack Pommer (DEM) 27680 100.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 51

St. Rep. District 12
2004 Election Results:
Paul Weissmann (DEM) 20842 67.03 %
Jim Egerton (REP) 10253 32.97 %
MHD PVI: D + 18.03

St. Rep. District 13
2004 Election Results:
Tom Plant (DEM) 31407 100.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 51

City and County of Broomfield:

St. Senate - District 23
2004 Election Results:
Shawn Mitchell (REP) 37787 58.43 %
Curt Darius Williams (DEM) 26889 41.57 %

St. Rep. District 33
2004 Election Results:
Dianne Primavera (DEM) 17454 47.33 %
Bill Berens (REP) 19426 52.67 %
MHD PVI: R + 1.67

City and County of Denver:

St. Senate - District 31
2004 Election Results:
Jennifer Veiga (DEM) 34856 100.00 %

St. Senate - District 33
2004 Election Results:
Peter C. Groff (DEM) 36863 100.00 %

St. Senate - District 35
2004 Election Results:
Ronald B. Olson (REP) 18258 34.76 %
Ken Gordon (DEM) 34272 65.24 %

St. Rep. District 1
2004 Election Results:
Dave Lewis (REP) 8534 39.39 %
Fran N. Coleman (DEM) 13132 60.61 %
MHD PVI: D + 11.61

St. Rep. District 2
2004 Election Results:
Mike Cerbo (DEM) 11687 100.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 51

St. Rep. District 3
2004 Election Results:
David A. Sprecace (REP) 12097 38.87 %
Anne L. McGihon (DEM) 19027 61.13 %
MHD PVI: D + 12.13

St. Rep. District 4
2004 Election Results:
K. Jerry Frangas (DEM) 15753 80.29 %
Rick D. Nevin (REP) 3866 19.71 %
MHD PVI: D + 31.29

St. Rep. District 5
2004 Election Results:
Joel Judd (DEM) 16310 78.75 %
John Wren (REP) 4402 21.25 %
MHD PVI: D + 29.75

St. Rep. District 6
2004 Election Results:
Andrew Romanoff (DEM) 23782 71.69 %
Gregory Nathan Golyansky (REP) 9391 28.31 %
MHD PVI: D + 22.69

St. Rep. District 7
2004 Election Results:
Terrance Carroll (DEM) 17994 100.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 51

St. Rep. District 8
2004 Election Results:
Rosemary Marshall (DEM) 22266 100.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 51

St. Rep. District 9
2004 Election Results:
Jerry B. Wheeler (REP) 10436 39.10 %
Alice Borodkin (DEM) 16255 60.90 %
MHD PVI: D + 11.90

Douglas County:

St. Senate - District 4
2004 Election Results:
Jim Miller (DEM) 23733 30.68 %
Tom J. Wiens (REP) 53617 69.32 %

St. Rep. District 43
2004 Election Results:
Craig Ziesman (DEM) 12945 35.82 %
Ted Harvey (REP) 23193 64.18 %
MHD PVI: R + 13.18

St. Rep. District 44
2004 Election Results:
Mike May (REP) 32787 100.00 %
MHD PVI: R + 49

St. Rep. District 45
2004 Election Results:
Penny Burley (DEM) 13057 30.49 %
James R. "Jim" Sullivan (REP) 29761 69.51 %
MHD PVI: R + 18.51

Jefferson County:

St. Senate - District 19
2004 Election Results:
Sue Windels (DEM) 31200 53.70 %
Jessica Corry (REP) 26905 46.30 %

St. Senate - District 21
2004 Election Results:
Deanna Hanna (DEM) 31046 59.48 %
Tori Merritts (REP) 21153 40.52 %

St. Rep. District 22
2004 Election Results:
Matt Knoedler (REP) 16607 51.80 %
Peter Mazula (DEM) 15450 48.20 %
MHD PVI: R + .80

St. Rep. District 23
2004 Election Results:
Ramey Johnson (REP) 13378 49.92 %
Gwyn Green (DEM) 13419 50.08 %
MHD PVI: D + 1.08

St. Rep. District 24
2004 Election Results:
Cheri Jahn (DEM) 18425 100.00 %
MHD PVI: D + 51

St. Rep. District 25
2004 Election Results:
Donna Red Wing (DEM) 16072 41.07 %
John Witwer (REP) 23057 58.93 %
MHD PVI: R + 7.93

St. Rep. District 26
2004 Election Results:
Betty Boyd (DEM) 16606 57.20 %
Mike Smith (REP) 12424 42.80 %
MHD PVI: D + 8.2

St. Rep. District 27
2004 Election Results:
Chris Rose (DEM) 15330 47.96 %
Bill Crane (REP) 16637 52.04 %
MHD PVI: R + 1.04

St. Rep. District 28
2004 Election Results:
Thomas Dittemore (DEM) 14079 42.44 %
Don Lee (REP) 19091 57.56 %
MHD PVI: R + 6.56

St. Rep. District 29
2004 Election Results:
Debbie J. Benefield (DEM) 15124 50.87 %
Bob Briggs (REP) 14604 49.13 %
MHD PVI: D + 1.87

Monday, January 17, 2005

"Its gonna be a long two years..."

Today marks the start of the second week of the 2005 session of the Colorado General Assembly. Here is a link to the Rocky Mountain New's coverage of the state legislature. The Denver Post doesn't have a special legislature page, but here is a link to their "local politics" page.

Last week we saw the first fireworks of what promises to be a nasty two years. The Republicans have not been in the minority of both houses in Colorado since Kennedy was in office and some members of the caucus are bitter over the loss.

The tone for the 2005 session was set early when State Senator Norma Anderson (R) of Lakewood made a move to block the election of State Senator Joan Fitz-Gerald (D) of Golden from assuming the post of President. The move failed, but it inspired some local columnists such as self described hippie Mike Littwin and the guys over at Colorado Pols to cry foul. (Check out Colorado Pols for an interesting line on the upcoming gubernatorial race, some interesting work going on there, still waiting on the odds for control of the State Legislatue)

Governor Bill Owens shot some rhetorical warning shots over the bow of the Democratic leadership in his State of the State address last week. If you compare it to State Senate President Joan Fitz-Gerald’s opening day remarks you can see where some of the biggest battles will be. Look for internal battles among the Democrats when it comes to social issues, such as the bill that would add sexual orientation to employment anti-discrimination state laws and between the Democrats and Republicans on fiscal matters, especially when it comes to the fate of Colorado's Tabor amendment which limits taxes and government growth.

Also, the Rocky Mountain Alliance of Bloggers got an invite to sit down with Governor Owens after the State of the State. It appears that the Guv has taken notice of the work of these well connected and articulate conservative bloggers. A picture of the gaggle is available here.

Look for a continuation later this week of my series on the state legislature. My last article can be found here. Cross posted at Polstate.

Wednesday, January 12, 2005

Delphi on Colorado: State Senate Leadership.

Today marks the first time since Kennedy was President that Democrats have control over both houses of Colorado's legislature. A link to the Rocky Mountain news is available here. As the state legislature opens, we can look forward to a colorful session. Tabor, the nationally known Taxpayers Bill of Rights, is sure to come under direct attack, not only by the Democratic majority, but by Higher Ed. and the AARP. Additionally, we will get the pleasure of watching infighting in both parties.

On the Democratic side: Colorado Labor Unions staged a rally today at the capital to announce exactly what they want from the Democrats, who, while they may not have signed IOUs, certainly owe Colorado Labor for their victory last election cycle. Key members of the Colorado Democratic party believe that if they play the "fiscal responsibility" card they can maintain their majorities in Colorado, a state where even as the GOP lost its majorities in the state legislature, it received tens of thousands more votes than the Democrats overall. This attempt by the Democratic leadership to stay away from "social issues" will sting the party faithful, who are already calling the historic Democratic victory a win for "GOP Lite."

Republicans are having some difficult times themselves. Immediately after their loss they chose new, more moderate leaders. However, this belies a civil war that is occurring in the party. An example of this is a open letter from the Chairman of the Jefferson County GOP to Bob Schaffer over a mailing that Schaffer sent out during the general election which probably cost a moderate Republican her seat. And how can we ignore the three ring circus that is Douglas Bruce's election to the El Paso County Commissioners.

Here is a look at the new leadership of the Colorado State Senate.

State Senate President Joan Fitz-Gerald (D) Golden, a social and fiscal liberal from New York, is the first female President of the State Senate.

The fiscally conservative Colorado Union of Taxpayers ranks Senator Fitz-Gerald as the 8th most fiscally liberal member of the State Senate. This is a special achievement since some Democrats, such as Paula Sandoval of Denver and Bob Hagedorn or Aurora are ranked as the 5th and 7th most conservative members of the State Senate (sandwiching outgoing Senate President John Andrews). In 2002 she voted with the Colorado Farm Bureau 75% of the time. In 2004 she received a A rating from the Colorado Political Voice for Animals. Also in 2004 she voted with the Colorado PIRG 100% of the time (if you aren’t familiar with the work of the state PIRGs, think of Ralph Nader), voted with the Colorado National Federation of Independent Business 41% of the time, voted with Equal Rights Colorado 100 % of the time, voted with Colorado Conservation Voters 100% of the time, voted with Colorado Women's Agenda 100% of the time, voted with Rocky Mountain Gun Owners 0% of the time in 2003 and got a grade of an F from the NRA in 2002. Going farther back she voted with the Colorado AFL-CIO 100% of the time in 2001. For a link to project vote smart’s group rating page click here. Overall, Senator Fitz-Gerald’s liberal pedigree is impeccable. In 2004 the most generally conservative think tank in Colorado, the Wilberforce Center, ranked Joan Fitz-Gerald the second most liberal member of the Colorado State Senate, behind only Ron Tupa (D) of Boulder.

Senator Ken Gordon, considered a moderate by many, has voting patterns that make him appear to be a mainstream to liberal Democrat, not a moderate.

The fiscally conservative Colorado Union of Taxpayers ranks Senator Gordon in the middle of the pack in the State Senate. In 2002 he voted with the Colorado Farm Bureau 80% of the time. In 2004 he received a A- rating from the Colorado Political Voice for Animals. Also in 2004 he voted with the Colorado PIRG 100% of the time, voted with the Colorado National Federation of Independent Business 41% of the time, voted with Equal Rights Colorado 100% of the time, voted with Colorado Conservation Voters 100% of the time, voted with Colorado Women's Agenda 100% of the time, voted with Rocky Mountain Gun Owners 0% of the time in 2003 and got a grade of an F from the NRA in 2004. Going farther back he voted with the Colorado AFL-CIO 100% of the time in 2001. Overall, it is hard to call Senator Gordon a moderate in a true sense of the word. However, in the more narrow context of among Democrats, he does appear to be mainstream. For those keeping count on how liberal this "mainstream" Democrat is, he is ranked fourth most liberal member of the State Senate by the Wilberforce Center.

This is the first in a series of articles looking at the State Legislature and how the mainstream media portrays it. Look for an in depth analysis of how the election was won in the coming weeks.

Cross posted at Polstate.

Text of letter from Jeffco GOP Chairman to Bob Schaffer.

Dear Bob:

As a loyal Republican and as Chairman of the Jefferson County Republicans I
was stunned by the Voucher mailing sent out to constituents of Ramey Johnson
in House District 23.

Although cleverly written not to urge voting against Ramey there can be not
other conclusion from the tenure of its content.

Bob, you have greatly disappointed many Republicans who were your greatest
supporters in your run for the U.S. Senate and who were upset over the way
they perceived you were treated by state leaders of our party with the
addition of Pete Coors as a candidate.

Under the circumstances I would have thought you would be more
sophisticated, especially with your background in our party and as a
legislator both here in Colorado in Washington, to have willingly engaged in
trying to influence the defeat of one of our party‚s standard bearers in
this general election. Right or wrong the time for such action would have
been to with an eye to a primary in support of one who might hold similar
beliefs about vouchers, or after the election --- not one week before the
general election.

I have spent two years as Chairman of our County urging all Republicans to
consider that they have more in common with each other than with the
Democrats. If people like you to whom many look to for leadership cannot be
trusted to work for all of our candidates that have earned their way on to
the ballot, what hope do we have for the future.

This party can not endure if segments of it continue to have such tunnel
vision for their one big issue that they fail to see the big picture that
our party, to be significant here in Colorado, must recognize that it is a
coalition of many factions held together by some very basic underlying
principles that distinguish us from the Dems.

We need people like you to be in the front lines bringing our party together
rather than sowing seeds of division.

Lynn Watwood
Chairman, Jefferson County Republicans

Delphi on Colorado version 2.0

We are back, look for some heavy posting over the next few days as we get our sea legs back. We are putting the finishing touches our overview of the 2004 election, which, we are still trying to get published (hello Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News).

Look to see the site get some major updates, new links and new analysis.

Sorry you all couldn't come to Mazatlan with us, but our southern command is only so big.

Thursday, November 18, 2004

What's Next?

As we wait for the final tallies, Me and Joe will be doing an analysis of the Colorado State Legislature elections. We both have an hypothesis that the extra money that the Democrats had in most races made the difference.

When that report becomes available, we will post it here. Look for it some time in Mid-December.

As for MHD. We are working on a Colorado Centric version of the Almanac of American Politics. Hopefully we can sell it to High School civics classes and intro to Political Science students at the University level.

We will be tracking the Colorado State Legislature this year, something that few non-partisan institutions do. Each member will have there group ratings posted, will be given MHD ratings for Economic and Social voting patterns, and we will develope, or more probably just apply, something like the Cook Partisan Voting Index. Basically, you'll know who is the most conservative and most liberal members of the body.

Looking forward, we may be moving to a new site in the coming months, somewhere where we can have interactive maps of the Colorado State House and Senate Districts. We won't be neglecting the 2003 elections, god knows what will show up next year.

I'll be posting regularly at Polstate, look for my posts.

Thursday, November 11, 2004

Il Silencio...MHD pays tribute to our fighting forces.

Originally from the WSJ last Friday...

But its the letters to be opened in the event of a death that are the most difficult to listen to, and at the same time the most tender, the most loving. Wearing a red sweater with a heart shaped U.S. flag knit into the front, Melissa Givens, the widow of Pfc. Jesse A. Givens, reads from a letter he wrote to her and their two sons:

"My family, I never thought that I would be writing a letter like this, I really don't know where to start. I've been getting bad feelings though and well if you're reading this...The happiest moments in my life all dealt with my little family. I will always have with me the small moments we all shared. the moments when you quit taking life so serious and smiled. The sounds of a beautiful boy's laughter or the simple nudge of a baby unborn. Each one of you. You saved me from the loneliness and taught me how to think beyond myself...Don't ever think that since I wasn't around that I didn't love you. You were conceived of love and I came to this terrible place for love...Please understand that I had to be gone so that I could take care of my family...Do me a favor. After you tuck Toad and Bean in, give them hugs and kisses from me. Go outside and look at the stars and count them. Don't forget to smile."

Pfc. Givens, assigned to Second Squadron, Third Armored Calvary Regiment out of Fort Carson, Colorado, died in a tank accident on May 1, 2003. He was 34 years old.

Friday, November 05, 2004

Rocky Mountain Blogger Bash, November 6th.

Come to the Rocky Mountain Blogger Bash this Saturday.

Click here for more information.

Thursday, November 04, 2004

Technology Thursday.

Planning on buying a new computer this holiday season? Ever wondered how to transfer your data from the old PC to the new one? Walter Mossberg has some help for you in today's Wall Street Journal.

The best product that he has found for moving data from one PC to another is Detto IntelliMover. The same company makes a product called Move2Mac that can transfer your data from a PC to a Mac.

If you need to move more than files try Alohabob PC Relocator from Eisenworld. It works for PCs.

Check out the Wall Street Journal's free Personal Technology Website.

Delphi on Election 2004.

Wow, what a great election. Over the next week we will look at the election results and break down how everything came out, basically this much input, that much output.

We almost called the Senate race exactly, (and with such a simple model; Democratic vote percent increases by 3.5% during Prez election cycles, always add 7.5% to GOP vote percent for polling errors, blam you get a net positive of 4% for the GOP candidate) the 2008 race should be great, we are looking at an open GOP seat (Allard won't be running) and a open Prez race.

The House races had no real surprises. Even with Jared Polis, the twenty something internet millionare, pouring money into ads against Beauprez and Musgrave, the Democrats only picked up the 3rd (Walcher surged at the end, but our initial projection was almost spot on, goes to show that you shouldn't tweak a econometric model with soft variables, such as our "surge factor" that pushed the 3rd into the toss-up category. We still called all the races correctly.

The State Senate was within our predicted range. Look for a huge battle in two years to take back the chamber by the GOP. The lesson must be learned that Colorado voters split tickets, they vote for the person, not the party. The GOP cannot afford to underfund their State Senate candidates. Our initial numbers on these races show that the Democrats outspent the GOP by a margin of 2:1, and for that they only gained a cumulative win differential (Dem vote % - GOP vote %) of 1.2%. They will have some massive fights ahead if they hope to keep the State Senate for longer than two years.

The State House was a complete surprise. We forcasted a 2 seat pickup, not a five seat loss. Haven't even started to crunch the numbers. But we are going to find a way to account for all the independent group numbers.

What to look for in 2006, the Governor's seat, State Senate and State House.

Our early projections will start this spring.

Watch for some major gridlock this spring, as the GOP minority and Governor Owens will try to force the Dems to push more radical bills that will be vetoed and used in 2006 as campaign fodder.

Wednesday, November 03, 2004

Colorado Election Results Mixed Bag for GOP, MHD.

The following is cross posted at Polstate where I blogged the election live.

President: Bush (R)
Senate: Salazar (D)
House: out of 7, 3 (D), 3 (R), one to close to call (3rd).

Major Setbacks for GOP in the State Senate, as of this writing GOP may lose control of the State Senate by one vote.

Also in the State House, the unthinkable, a major Democratic coup, Dems knock off at least five GOP seats, may take State House for first time in over a generation.

9:15 CBS Projects Colorado For Bush.
11:00 Rocky Mountain News Projects Salazar the winner of Colorado's Senate Seat.
11:02 Drudge Calls the Election for Bush. GOP Headquarters went wild.

As of midnight.

President: MHD: Bush. Results: Bush (R) 53%, Kerry (D) 46%. 70% reporting.
U.S. Senate: MHD: Salazar (D) 50.3%, Coors (D) 48.3%. Results: Salazar 51%, Coors 48%. 82% reporting.
U.S. House:
District 1: MHD: Degette. Results: Degette (D) 73%, Chicas (R) 24%. 88% reporting.
District 2: MHD: Udall. Results: Udall (D) 63%, Hackman (R) 34%. 54% reporting.
District 3: MHD: Toss-up. Results: Salazar (D) 49%, Walcher (R) 47%. 67% reporting.
District 4: MHD:Musgrave. Results: Musgrave (R) 51%, Matsunaka (D) 44%. 68% reporting.
District 5: MHD: Hefley. Results: Hefley (R) 70%, Hardee (D) 27%. 91% reporting.
District 6: MHD: Tancredo. Results: Tancredo (R) 59%, Conti (D) 38%. 99% reporting.
District 7: MHD: Beauprez. Results: Beauprez (R) 55%, Thomas (D) 42%. 98% reporting.

State Senate: MHD: GOP 17-20, Dems 15-18. Results: GOP 17, Dems 17, Toss-up 1. GOP has lost SD 28, only if Hume wins in SD 17 can they hold the State Senate. As of this writing zero % reporting.

State House: MHD: GOP 39, Dems 26. Results GOP 30, Dems 32, Toss-up 3. Reports coming in over 850 KOA, the GOP may also lose the State House for the first time since Watergate, Dems have picked up HD 18, 29, 31, 61 and 64. HD 48, 50 and 56 are still either to close to call or don't have enough results in. Either way this is a major set back for the Republican State Party.

State Wide Ballot Issues:
Amendment 34 - Developer Lawsuit Reform: MHD:For 36%, Against 64%. Results: For 23%, Against 76%. 83% reporting.
Amendment 35 - Raise Taxes on Cigarettes: MHD:For 55%, Against 45%. Results: For 61%, Against 38%. 83% reporting.
Amendment 36 - Electoral College Reform: MHD:For 25%, Against 75%. Results: For 34%, Against 65%. 83% reporting.
Amendment 37 - Renewable Energy Mandates: MHD:For 46%, Against 54%. Results: For 52%, Against 47%. 80% reporting.
Ref. A: MHD: Pass. Results: For 39%, Against 60%. 80% reporting.
Ref. B: MHD: Pass. Results: For 69%, Against 30%. 80% reporting.

Denver Metro Items.
Ref. 4A (FasTracks): MHD: For 46%, Against 54%. Results: For 58%, Against 41%. 71% reporting.
Ref. 4B (SCFD): MHD: Pass. Results: For 65%, Against 34%. 85% reporting.

State Senate Seat By Seat (Campaign Funds for Select Races)
SD 1 Eastern Colorado (R)
No Election
SD 2 Southeastern Colorado (R)
No Election
SD 3 Northwest Pueblo County (D)
No Election
SD 4 Lake, Park, Teller, Douglas Counties and northwestern El Paso County (Leans Rep)
Jim Miller (D) $31,055 vs. Tom Weins $45,235(R) Projected Winner (R)
SD 5 South Central Colorado (R)
No Election
SD 6 Southwestern Colorado (D)
No Election
SD 7 Mesa County (R)
No Election
SD 8 Northwestern Colorado (Weak Rep)
Inc. Jack Taylor $40,080(R) vs. Jay Fetcher $69,381(D) Projected Winner (R)
SD 9 Northern El Paso County (R)
No Election
SD 10 Eastern El Paso County (Strong Rep)
Inc. Ron May (R) unopposed
SD 11 Central Colorado Springs (R)
No Election
SD 12 Southern El Paso County (Strong Rep)
Inc. Andy McElhany (R) vs. Robert Herzfeld (Lib.) no Dem. Projected Winner (R)
SD 13 Most of Weld County (R)
No Election
SD 14 Ft. Collins (Toss-up)
Bob Bacon $161,098(D) vs. Ray Martinez $1,425(R) Projected Winner (D)
SD 15 Larimer County except Ft. Collins (R)
No Election
SD 16 North central mountains (D)
No Election
SD 17 Louisville, Lafayette (Toss-up)
Brandon Shaffer $117,421(D) vs. Sandy Hume $68,065(R) Projected Winner (Not enough data)
SD 18 Boulder (Safe Dem)
Inc. Ron Tupa (D) vs. Krista Poch (R) Projected Winner (D)
SD 19 Arvada, Westminster (Weak Dem)
Inc. Sue Windels $115,701(D) vs. Jessica Corry $59,425(R) Projected Winner (D)
SD 20 Golden, Wheat Ridge (D)
No Election
SD 21 Lakewood (Leans Dem)
Inc. Deanna Hanna $125,858(D) vs. Tori Merritts Unknown(R) Projected Winner (D)
SD 22 Southern Jefferson County (R)
No Election
SD 23 Southern Weld County (Leans Rep)
Shawn Mitchell $39,345(R) vs. Curt Darius Williams $10,334(D) Projected Winner (R)
SD 24 Federal Heights (D)
No Election
SD 25 Adams County (Leans Dem)
Inc. Stephanie Takis (D) vs. Kevin Blount (R) Projected Winner (D)
SD 26 Englewood, Littleton (Leans Rep)
Inc. Jim Dyer $15,584(R) vs. Jared Ingwalson (D) Projected Winner (R)
SD 27 Eastern Arapahoe County (Leans Rep)
Inc. Nancy Spence $36,245(R) vs. Lisa Love $2,476(D) Projected Winner (R)
SD 28 Southern Aurora (Toss-up)
Inc. Bruce Cairnes $61,210(R) vs. Suzanne Williams $136,991(D) Projected Winner (D)
SD 29 Northen Aurora (Safe Dem)
Inc. Bob Hagedorn (D) vs. Mike Martin (R) Projected Winner (D)
SD 30 Parker, Highlands Ranch (R)
No Election
SD 31 Central, Northwest Denver (Safe Dem)
Inc. Jennifer Veiga unopposed Projected Winner (D)
SD 32 South Denver (Safe Dem)
No Election
SD 33 Northeast Denver (Safe Dem)
Inc. Peter Groff unopposed Projected Winner (D)
SD 34 West Denver (D)
No Election
SD 35 Southeast Denver (Safe Dem)
Inc. Ken Gordon (D) vs. Ron Olson (R) Projected Winner (D)

Monday, November 01, 2004

Final Projections.

President Bush 273, Kerry 265. GOP Hold.
U.S. Senate 52 Republicans, 47 Democrats and 1 Ind. GOP Hold.
U.S. House 234 Republicans, 201 Democrats (including Sanders of Vermont). GOP Hold.
Colorado Senate Salazar (D) 50.3%, Coors (R) 48.3%. Dem Pickup.
Colorado House CD 1(D) Strong Dem, CD 2(D) Strong Dem, CD 3(Toss-up) , CD 4(R) Leans GOP, CD 5(R) Strong GOP, CD 6(R) Strong GOP, CD 7(R) Weak GOP.

Final Projection for the 3rd, a tie of 47%-47%. As such it is a toss-up, but all the momentum is for the GOP.

Delphi on the Colorado State Legislative Races.

State Senate 17-20 Republicans, 15-18 Democrats. Leans GOP.

State House 39 Republicans, 26 Democrats. GOP Hold.

State Wide (Except 4A and 4B) Ballot Issues. (Confidence Levels)
Amendment 34 - Developer Lawsuit Reforms - For 36%, Against 64%. (Landslide)
Amendment 35 - Raise Taxes on Cigarettes - For 55%, Against 45%. (Weak)
Amendment 36 - Reforming Colorado's Electorial College Vote - For 25%, Against 75%. (Landslide)
Amendment 37 - Renewable Energy Mandates - For 46%, Against 54%. (Weak)
FasTracks (Ref. 4A) - For 46%, Against 54%. (Weak)
SCFD (Ref. 4B) - For , Against . (Landslide)
Ref. A - Pass (Landslide)
Ref. B - Pass (Landslide)



Tuesday, October 12, 2004

Technology Tuesday.

Taken from Lee Gomes "Portals" 10/04/2004 in the Wall Street Journal.

"What is it about the future that leaves us unable to ever quite guess how its going to turn out? The question comes up, this time, because of the recent, much discussed ascent of Web logs, or blogs. The blogging phenomenon illustrates how some very smart people ended up being both very right and very wrong about a future just beyond the horizon.

A year ago, blogs -outside of the small circle of people who actually wrote and read them- were regarded as the daily diaries of peole with no real lives to chronicle in the first place. No more...For historians of technical predictions, blogs are noteworthy because of what the reveal aobut the evolution of something called XML.

XML stands for Extensible Markup Language. It's basically a format that two computers can use to exchange information.

Five or so years ago, XML was going to be technology's Next Big Thing. If you remember Microsoft's .Net initiative...XML was the catalyst the wold enable .Net...

Fast forword now to something called RSS, or Really Simple Syndication, with is a technology that bloggers use to, in a manner of speaking, broadcast their writing throughout the Internet. RSS, it turns out, is actually a kind of XML.

Because of blogging, RSS is very hot right now, and it's spreading quickly...Last week, Yahoo gave RSS a big embrace: If something is available in RSS, you'll be able to put it on your My Yahoo page.

In other words, thanks to blogs, XML-in the form of RSS- has finally arrived...

One issue to watch with the current growth spurt of RSS is what it will do to traditional Web economics. For example, some political junkies...spend much of their time these days using Web site called Bloglines to follow election oriented blogs. Because of its felicitous use of RSS technology, Bloglines will often let you read all of the entries from some very popular blogs without leaving the bloglines site- in other words, without vistiong each blogs Web pages individually.

What will happen when bloggers realize that RSS may lead to fewer eyeballs at their sites?

Monday, October 11, 2004

Delphi on Colorado State-Wide Referenda.

MHD is currently working on a universal model to predict these state wide issues. If I can finish tweaking it this week, you should see something much like the CAPM that you may have met in Biz School.

If you see any links missing, or want me to add your site, tell me. If you know of any poll I may have missed, tell me.

Amendment 34. Pro side Committee to Take Back Our Property Rights . Con side Coloradans for Responsible Reform.

Past Poll Results:

Date-Firm-For-Against
9/14-18-Cirulli-43%-31%
9/23-POS-44%-41%
10/25-27-Mason-Dixon-22%-64%


Amendment 35. Pro side Citizens for a Healthier Colorado. Against a group called "Protect Our Constitution, Vote No on 35" which doesn't seem to have a website and The Independece Institute a libertarian think tank which opposes most tax increases.

Past Poll Results:

Date-Firm-For-Against
10/8-SUSA-62%-36%
10/25-27-Mason-Dixon-58%-35%


Amendment 36. Pro side All Votes Matter. Against Coloradoans Against a Really Stupid Idea and Tyroblog's 86 36, a blog devoted to defeating Amendment 36.

Past Poll Results:

Date-Firm-For-Against
9/22-RMN/News4-47%-35%
10/6-Mason/Dixon-35%-44%
10/8-SUSA-45%-44%
10/25-27-Mason-Dixon-31%-55%


Amendment 37. Pro side Coloradans for Clean Energy. Against Citizens for Sensible Energy Choices.

Past Poll Results:

Date-Firm-For-Against
9/12-13-POS-74%-19%
10/25-27-Mason-Dixon-45%-39%

Ref. 4-A "FasTracks". Not state wide, only in Denver area. Pro side FasTracks Yes!. Against Taxpayers Against Congestion and The Independence Institute.

Past Poll Results:

Date-Firm-For-Against
12/15-16-POS-63%-33%
4/30-Hill-69%-30%
9/12-13-POS-62%-32%
10/8-Hill-52%-25%
FasTracks Yes! released a internal poll from the same time as the Denver Metro Chamber's Hill poll, but until some internals are available, I'm loath to add it.
10/8-Mason-Dixon-54%-33%
10/25-27-Mason-Dixon-50%39%

Delphi on Colorado, Monday updates.

This week we will finish our links to Colorado Races.

Monday: Links and averages for state-wide issues.

Tuesday: Technology Tuesday and finish links to State Legislative Races. We will have links to all State Senate Races. Our links to State House Races will only be for battle-ground districts.

Wednesday: Wictory Wednesday and our new and improved models for state-wide issues and for the congressional district races.

Thursday: Technology Thursday and predictions for all State Senate races.

Friday: Financial Friday. We find great articles on personal finance, you use them to increase your wealth.

Friday, October 08, 2004

Updated Presidential and Senate Predictions.

We have added Real Clear Politics to our electoral vote average. The new averages (dividing tossups in half) gives Bush a lead of 283 electoral votes and Kerry trails with 255 electoral votes. The only site to update its figures was Electoral-Vote.com, its old figures were Bush-285 and Kerry-232 with 17 electoral votes tied. Electoral-Vote.com now has Kerry leading 280-239 with 19 electoral votes tied.

Our old figures were Bush-293, Kerry 245 on 10/6/2004. Bush has lost 10 EV in the last two days.

We have also updated our Colorado Senate race figures. Coors now leads Salazar 50.33% to 48.66%. The new USA Today poll, which shows Salazar with a massive lead has pulled the race into basically a dead-heat.

Our old figures were Coors 53.2%, Salazar 46.6% on 9/28/2004.

Delphi on the Second Presidential Debate.

With Bush and Kerry dead-locked in the polls here in Colorado, scores of CU students have decided that the best way to deal with the close election is the have some fun.

Your correspondent will (at great personal risk being a Republican in Boulder) attend several of these "Debate" parties. It seems that a new drinking game has sprung up around the presidential race. Every time either candidate says "Iraq" everyone has to take a drink. From what I understand, that doesn’t mean a sip, but a shot or an entire beer.

Hopefully I can avoid being in any house when foreign policy comes up, but if I am, I'll be taking pictures to document the student's rebellion against the administration's crackdown on drinking, and the constant badgering from liberals and conservatives alike, ie "Are you registered to vote?"

Cross posted at Polstate.com, which also has a open thread for the debate, feel free to go over there and debate the debate, nonpartisan site with lots of traffic.

Thursday, October 07, 2004

Wictory Wednesday. Focus on SD 19.

State Senate District 19 (Westminster and Arvada) is our featured legislative race this cycle. It pits incumbent Sue Windels (D) against Jessica Corry (R).

This district was, until four years ago, represented by the solidly conservative Jim Congrove, who now is running for Jeffco Commissioner after defeating a rare Republican RTD Director, Wally Pulliam.

Jessica Corry works at the Independence Institute, a libertarian think tank in Golden that has been the spring board for such Colorado conservative icons as Jon Caldara, Mike Rosen, Tom Tancredo and Bill Armstrong. Jessica heads up the Campus Accountability Project, an effort “to serve as an educational resource on free speech, ideological diversity, and racial discrimination, and to operate as a watch dog, seeking to ensure that universities are observing the individual rights of faculty, staff, and students.”

She faces Sue Windels (who Joe will be interviewing in a week or so for balance). Senator Windels, who won victory last time by less than the margin of the Libertarian candidate, has not voted like the moderate she would need to be to keep the seat, instead she has voted like a true liberal. The GOP won her State House seat back when she went to the Senate, its time to bring this seat back to the GOP.

MHD chose this seat because it is the home of the most vulnerable incumbent. It also represents the huge difference in ideology between the two candidates. Windels has raised $80,551 so far. Her top five donors are the DSCF Democratic Senate C Fund: $5,000, JCEA-PAC Small Donor Committee:$2,000, Colorado Professional Firefighters SDC: $2,000, Pipefitters Local 208: $2,000, Colorado AFL-CIO Nonparisian: $2,000. A lot of Union money and small donor committee money coming in here.

Corry has so far raised $42,860, her top five contributors are herself: $8,000, Steve Durham: $400, Chris Drummond: $200, Joe Smith: $200, Linda Corry: $200. Besides herself, her largest contributors are small personal donations. She needs help if she is going to win. Donate here. I’ve put together four volunteers who are going to help me walk her district with her. I challenge everyone who reads this and is a GOP partisan, donate $40 dollars to Jessica, then e-mail me or post your donation. Lets set a goal of $400. I just need nine other people to pitch in to reach that goal.

Oh, and trust me, Joe is working on something for our liberal readers, Colorado Republicans have got to get their butts in gear; we’re slacking.



Wednesday, October 06, 2004

Delphi on the Presidential Race.

Final Update: 11/01/2004

Our final average for the 2004 election is in. Bush should narrowly beat Kerry 273 to 265. In the popular vote, the averages predict a small Bush victory of 49.66% to Kerry's 48.35%.

My personal projection, it won't be that close. We will know by about midnight mountain time who the winner is.

Update: 10/11/2004. Three updates today. Election Projection is now forecasting a narrow Bush win. Bush 274, Kerry 264. Electoral-Vote.com is forecasting a Kerry win with Kerry getting 280 electoral votes and Bush getting 254 (NH is a toss-up). Real Clear Politics is forecasting Bush getting 264, Kerry getting 220, with 54 electoral votes in tossup states.

The Crystal Ball and Federal Review have no updates.

As such the new totals are Bush 274+256+295+284+264+27/5 = 280. Kerry 264+282+243+254+220+27/5 = 258.

On 10/6/2004 the average was Bush 293, Kerry 245. Two days later it was Bush 283, Kerry 255. As it stands now, Bush has lost 3 electoral votes since 10/9/04 and Kerry has picked up three.


Original Post: 10/06/2004
MHD isn't even going to try to do the heavy lifting in the Presidential race. Instead, we will update on a regular basis the average electoral college numbers from Election Projection, Electoral-Vote.com, Federal Review and The Crystal Ball. Each site is weighted the same.

If you know of any other sites that deserve to be included in the average, post it, we are slaves to our readers.

This week at MHD.

This week MHD will focus on one very important thing, making the site more user friendly. In the pursuit of this, we will be adding links to nearly all of the candidates in the Colorado legislative races and links to the ballot issues.

Wictory Wednesday will come off as usual.

Thursday will be "Technology Thursday" with some great links to resources that will help you take advantage of the future of radio and cleaning up that messy pile of business cards in your desk drawer.

Sometime during the week we will add in the links to the legislative races, ballot issues and Federal candidates.

Over the weekend we will introduce our new model for predicting races, we still have about a hundred data points to enter, and then we have to teak the model, but by Monday, you should be able to look at predictions for all the Colorado ballot issues and legislative races.

Friday, October 01, 2004

Delphi on the Colorado Legislative Races.

As it stands now the GOP controls Colorado's State Senate by a single vote. This election the Democrats stand to pick up maybe one seat, but they are defending two very competitive seats. It could break either way.

Best Democratic Projection: Dem. 18, Rep. 17.
Best GOP Projection: Rep. 20, Dem. 15.

Current Estimates: Dem. 15-18, Rep. 17-20. Likely outcome: leans GOP.

Interactive Maps: State Senate Districts Outside the Metro Area.
Metro Denver State Senate Districts.

The Colorado House is safe GOP, it would take a major shift (a la Watergate) for the Democratic party to take control of the State House.

State Senate Seat By Seat:

SD 1 Eastern Colorado (R)
No Election
SD 2 Southeastern Colorado (R)
No Election
SD 3 Northwest Pueblo County (D)
No Election
SD 4 Lake, Park, Teller, Douglas Counties and northwestern El Paso County (Leans Rep)
Jim Miller (D) $31,055 vs. Tom Weins $45,235(R)
SD 5 South Central Colorado (R)
No Election
SD 6 Southwestern Colorado (D)
No Election
SD 7 Mesa County (R)
No Election
SD 8 Northwestern Colorado (Weak Rep)
Inc. Jack Taylor $40,080(R) vs. Jay Fetcher $69,381(D)
SD 9 Northern El Paso County (R)
No Election
SD 10 Eastern El Paso County (Strong Rep)
Inc. Ron May (R) unopposed
SD 11 Central Colorado Springs (R)
No Election
SD 12 Southern El Paso County (Strong Rep)
Inc. Andy McElhany (R) vs. Robert Herzfeld (Lib.) no Dem.
SD 13 Most of Weld County (R)
No Election
SD 14 Ft. Collins (Toss-up)
Bob Bacon $161,098(D) vs. Ray Martinez $1,425(R)
SD 15 Larimer County except Ft. Collins (R)
No Election
SD 16 North central mountains (D)
No Election
SD 17 Louisville, Lafayette (Toss-up)
Brandon Shaffer $117,421(D) vs. Sandy Hume $68,065(R)
SD 18 Boulder (Safe Dem)
Inc. Ron Tupa (D) vs. Krista Poch (R)
SD 19 Arvada, Westminster (Weak Dem)
Inc. Sue Windels $115,701(D) vs. Jessica Corry $59,425(R)
SD 20 Golden, Wheat Ridge (D)
No Election
SD 21 Lakewood (Leans Dem)
Inc. Deanna Hanna $125,858(D) vs. Tori Merritts Unknown(R)
SD 22 Southern Jefferson County (R)
No Election
SD 23 Southern Weld County (Leans Rep)
Shawn Mitchell $39,345(R) vs. Curt Darius Williams $10,334(D)
SD 24 Federal Heights (D)
No Election
SD 25 Adams County (Leans Dem)
Inc. Stephanie Takis (D) vs. Kevin Blount (R)
SD 26 Englewood, Littleton (Leans Rep)
Inc. Jim Dyer $15,584(R) vs. Jared Ingwalson (D)
SD 27 Eastern Arapahoe County (Leans Rep)
Inc. Nancy Spence $36,245(R) vs. Lisa Love $2,476(D)
SD 28 Southern Aurora (Toss-up)
Inc. Bruce Cairnes $61,210(R) vs. Suzanne Williams $136,991(D)
SD 29 Northen Aurora (Safe Dem)
Inc. Bob Hagedorn (D) vs. Mike Martin (R)
SD 30 Parker, Highlands Ranch (R)
No Election
SD 31 Central, Northwest Denver (Safe Dem)
Inc. Jennifer Veiga unopposed
SD 32 South Denver (Safe Dem)
No Election
SD 33 Northeast Denver (Safe Dem)
Inc. Peter Groff unopposed
SD 34 West Denver (D)
No Election
SD 35 Southeast Denver (Safe Dem)
Inc. Ken Gordon (D) vs. Ron Olson (R)

State House Seat By Seat:

Use these interactive maps to check on each district.

State House Districts Metro Denver North of Hampden Ave. House Districts 1-9, 22-24, 26, 27, 29, 32, 34, 35, 41 and 42.

State House Districts Southern Front Range, Pueblo to Hampden Ave. House Districts 14-18,20, 21, 25, 28, 36-39, 44 and 47.

State House Districts Northern Front Range, 120th Ave to Wyoming. House Districts 10-13, 31, 33, 48, 51 and 52.

Colorado House Districts Outside of the Front Range. House Districts 65-53, 50, 49, 46, 45, 43, 40, 19.

Delphi on Colorado's Competitive House Races (3rd and 7th)

MHD will be leaving the current predictions up until we have finished constructing a new model some time in the next fortnight. The new model will add a variable for "funding advantage" as a amendment to our current model which is Coloradocentric and leans heavily on prior race results and voter registration numbers.